Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete · Texas

Greater Austin Development

Austin, TX · ~276 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greater Austin Development runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete workplace, earning a grade D.

Greater Austin Development: 4.6 TCR = 166% of Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greater Austin Development safety composite

Greater Austin Development scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greater Austin Development: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2021

Greater Austin Development's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 166% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #182/206
  • PHOTO Atlas Industrial Ser…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~276 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlas Industrial Services LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Greater Austin Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greater Austin Development averages 4.6 TCR (166% of the Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greater Austin Development TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.3 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=4 · BLS 2.8

Where Greater Austin Development falls in its industry

1,634 Curb and gutter construction, establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #182 safest of 206 Curb and gutter construction, employers in Texas.

Greater Austin Development (276 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Greater Austin Development
Greater Austin Development (276 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Greater Austin Development has more employees than the Curb and gutter construction, residentia median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 4.0 14 0 0
2020 8.2 7.9 26 0 0
2018 6.3 6.1 23 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · TX · Austin

1,634 Curb and gutter construction, residential and commercial driveway and parking area, concrete employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlas Industrial Services LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Specialty Contractors - Branch 027 - Tulsa, OK 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICC Oxnard 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Island Irrigation Inc 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coterra Energy Inc. 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHASCO CONSTRUCTORS 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smurfit Kappa Forney Mill 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clear Lake 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Libbey Toledo Plant 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aerc - 02 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at General Mills-Main Loc Cafe 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Warm Springs Indian Head Casino 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Image, LLC dba GTI 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Forest Nursing Center 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana Casualty 276 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homewood-Flossmoor Park District 276 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.