Building cleaning services, janitorial · Kentucky

Greater Cincinnati Region

Erlanger, KY · ~118 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greater Cincinnati Region runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Greater Cincinnati Region: 1.2 TCR = 26% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greater Cincinnati Region safety composite

Greater Cincinnati Region scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greater Cincinnati Region held a steady TCR band

Greater Cincinnati Region's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.4 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.4 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Erlanger, KY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/62
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT TIDELANDS …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT TIDELANDS WACCAMAW ES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Greater Cincinnati Region in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greater Cincinnati Region averages 1.2 TCR (26% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greater Cincinnati Region TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Greater Cincinnati Region falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 62 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Kentucky.

Greater Cincinnati Region (118 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greater Cincinnati Region
Greater Cincinnati Region (118 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Greater Cincinnati Region has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · KY · Erlanger

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 118 employers in Erlanger, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT TIDELANDS WACCAMAW ES 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBRE Microsoft 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ES-Carroll Manor 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 302201 - WPAFB - Area A 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Calumet Farm LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Crafts, Inc. (KY Region) 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMC Service Company 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALLTECH BEVERAGE DIVISION 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR CVG US HUB 3,714 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KCVG 3,700 FTE
CITY-NEAR CVG RO 3,576 FTE
CITY-NEAR CVGGATEWAY 697 FTE
NAT-TCR Metropolitan Council Regional Administration 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Solvay Fluorides 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caldwell & Walsh Building Construction, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville- CF 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Standard, East Village Hotel 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imperial Pools Latham 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canton Elevator 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Velvet Ice Cream Co - Utica 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.