Regional planning and development program administration · Minnesota

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration

St. Paul, MN · ~390 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Regional planning and development program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Regional planning and development program administration BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration safety composite

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2023

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration injury rate improved

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 925120 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P64
  • PHOTO Community Services B…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~390 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Services Board (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metropolitan Council Regional Administration averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Regional planning and development program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration TCR series: 2019=0.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Metropolitan Council Regional Administration falls in its industry

50 Regional planning and developm establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Metropolitan Council Regional Administration (390 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Metropolitan Council Regional Administration
Metropolitan Council Regional Administration (390 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Metropolitan Council Regional Administration has more employees than the Regional planning and development progra median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.2 3.7 11 3 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

925120 · MN · St. Paul

50 Regional planning and development program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Services Board 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin County Community Development 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Planning and Development Services 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Services Building 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkel US Operations Corp 390 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2198 390 FTE
STATE-SIZE 55872 Roseville 390 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Michael - Albertville High School 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR YCID 5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR IT Campus 2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR Greater Cincinnati Region 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Solvay Fluorides 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Caldwell & Walsh Building Construction, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Basic Management, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Cottonwood 390 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modesto DC #089 390 FTE
NAT-SIZE IDEX Health & Science LLC (COE) 390 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #63 390 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.