Processed meats manufacturing · Wisconsin

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant

Green Bay, WI · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant runs at 332% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Processed meats manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant: 10.9 TCR = 332% of Processed meats manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant safety composite

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.9

2018→2021

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant injury rate improved

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant's TCR fell 21.9 from 21.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=21.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311612 · Green Bay, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 332% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #48/52
  • PHOTO WMP - Planta Procesa…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WMP - Planta Procesadora (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant averages 10.9 TCR (332% of the Processed meats manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant TCR series: 2018=21.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant falls in its industry

613 Processed meats manufacturing establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 52 Processed meats manufacturing employers in Wisconsin.

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant (42 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant
Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant (42 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 202 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Green Bay Dressed Beef, LLC - Northland Plant has fewer employees than the Processed meats manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 21.9 21.9 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311612 · WI · Green Bay

613 Processed meats manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WMP - Planta Procesadora 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fricks Quality Meats 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richards Cajun Foods Corporation 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Papa Cantella's Inc. 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Port Washington Generating Station 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Water, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Irrigation Co 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bielinski Homes 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Greensboro 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fountain View of Fremont 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4818-SOMB 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rollin Valley Farms 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Denver 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-508-Pottery Barn 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-752-Pottery Barn 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Star North Dairy 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.