Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Wisconsin

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display

Waukesha, WI · ~50 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display safety composite

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display: 1.7 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2023

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.7 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Waukesha, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/25
  • PHOTO Pregis- Carol Stream
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pregis- Carol Stream (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Packaging Baird Display averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Packaging Baird Display falls in its industry

236 Cards, die-cut (except office establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 25 Cards, die-cut (except office employers in Wisconsin.

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display (50 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Packaging Baird Display
Green Bay Packaging Baird Display (50 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Green Bay Packaging Baird Display has fewer employees than the Cards, die-cut (except office supply) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2018 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2017 1.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · WI · Waukesha

236 Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 285 employers in Waukesha, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pregis- Carol Stream 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neenah Finishing Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crusader 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6178 Stockton RTS 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferguson's Morningside Orchard LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windsor 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pagels Ponderosa Cropping LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&M Dittrich Mink Farm 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waukesha Memorial Hospital 2,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Generac-Waukesha 1,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEHC : Waukesha WI (WSO), HCS 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Generac Power Systems, Inc. 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR Hill Manufacturing Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LINC 6161 (Peoria CAT - F) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospice of Davidson County 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospitalists 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thomco Specialty Products, Suwanee 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE KW Woodworks 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neuroptics, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newton Construction & Management, Inc 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.