Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard · Ohio

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati

Lebanon, OH · ~133 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati safety composite

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2019

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Lebanon, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #35/109
  • PHOTO International Paper …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Paper Houston Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 109 Boxes, shipping, laminated pap employers in Ohio.

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati (133 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati
Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati (133 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Green Bay Packaging Cincinnati has more employees than the Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and pap median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 1.3 4 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OH · Lebanon

1,338 Boxes, shipping, laminated paper and paperboard, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 69 employers in Lebanon, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Paper Houston Container 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aerosafe Global - Buffalo Rd 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Converting Division Houston), LLC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper - Waxahachie Sheets 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petta Enterprises Cambridge 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Canton 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Foam Technologies Beach City 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abbott Electric 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVICS Ohio Manufacturing, Inc. 979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mane Inc. Lebanon Production 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ralph J. Stolle Countryside YMCA 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Gaming and Racing, LLC 427 FTE
NAT-TCR Maryland APG 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Livonia Transmission 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KIT Savannah GA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AMB030 Plantarium 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pawtucket Skilled Nursing 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stonehedge MA SNF LLC 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE DoubleTree Philadelphia Airport 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smyrna DNI 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.