Poultry Processing · Arkansas

Green Forest Plant

Green Forest, AR · ~1,289 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Forest Plant runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Poultry Processing workplace, earning a grade F.

Green Forest Plant: 7.1 TCR = 215% of Poultry Processing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Forest Plant safety composite

Green Forest Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

Green Forest Plant injury rate improved

Green Forest Plant's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.6 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.6 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=25.9 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Green Forest, AR ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 215% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #52/69
  • PHOTO Dakota Provisions
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 162 inj
  • SIZE ~1,289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dakota Provisions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Green Forest Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Forest Plant averages 7.1 TCR (215% of the Poultry Processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Forest Plant TCR series: 2017=2.6 · 2018=4 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=25.9 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Green Forest Plant falls in its industry

509 Poultry Processing establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 69 Poultry Processing employers in Arkansas.

Green Forest Plant (1,289 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Forest Plant
Green Forest Plant (1,289 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Green Forest Plant has more employees than the Poultry Processing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.9 12 7 0
2023 1.3 1.0 11 3 0
2022 9.3 8.8 16 88 0
2021 7.7 7.4 12 77 0
2020 25.9 25.2 17 291 2
2019 4.2 2.8 33 21 0
2018 4.0 2.9 37 20 0
2017 2.6 1.7 24 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · AR · Green Forest

509 Poultry Processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 10 employers in Green Forest, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dakota Provisions 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DECATUR PROCESSING 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amick Farms, LLC MD Processing Plant 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Liberty Foods Tremonton 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE White River Medical Center 1,286 FTE
STATE-SIZE 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hope Plant 1,294 FTE
STATE-SIZE ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR Green Forest Par-Fry Plant 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI / TYSON FOODS INC. - GREEN FOREST 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI - 0527 Tyson Foods Inc. - Green Forest 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-TCR St Joseph Plant 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Doyle Sims & Sons Trucking Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Watsonville Distribution Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheriff's Office 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE All Heart Homecare Agency Inc. - Brooklyn 1,289 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Heart Homecare Agency - NYC 1,289 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0588 - Phoenix AZ DC 1,289 FTE
NAT-SIZE UC Health 1,289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.