Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Colorado

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley

Eckley, CO · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley: 8.2 TCR = 183% of Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley safety composite

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley: 0.0 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 16.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2020

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley's TCR rose 11.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 11.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Eckley, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.2 · 183% of ind

  • DART 11.7 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO ZX Ranch - Paisley
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ZX Ranch - Paisley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley averages 8.2 TCR (183% of the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=16.2 · 2019=5 · 2020=11.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley falls in its industry

165 Cattle feedlots (except stocky establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Cattle feedlots (except stocky employers in Colorado.

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley (36 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley
Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley (36 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley has fewer employees than the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.7 11.7 5 0 0
2019 5.0 5.0 2 0 0
2018 16.2 16.2 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · CO · Eckley

165 Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ZX Ranch - Paisley 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunbelt Feed Yard 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4M Feeders 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brawley, CA Farm Aviation 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Core-Tech Wireline Services, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Volumetrics Measurement 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limon Wind Plant 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - CENTENNIAL - OMI 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Eckley 32 FTE
NAT-TCR Chancellor Farms Est.-MPHI Properties, Inc 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Madeira 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Carberry Senior Living Center 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6 Paramus, Nj 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wna - Nola 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta, GA Regional Office - pms95100 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 36-Villa Espana 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.W. Clyde & Co. - Springville Shop 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.