Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Sunbelt Feed Yard

Hugoton, KS · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sunbelt Feed Yard runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Sunbelt Feed Yard: 8.3 TCR = 184% of Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sunbelt Feed Yard safety composite

Sunbelt Feed Yard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Sunbelt Feed Yard injury rate improved

Sunbelt Feed Yard's TCR fell 0.9 from 11.6 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Hugoton, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.3 · 184% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #39/50
  • PHOTO ZX Ranch - Paisley
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ZX Ranch - Paisley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Sunbelt Feed Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sunbelt Feed Yard averages 8.3 TCR (184% of the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sunbelt Feed Yard TCR series: 2016=11.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=5 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Sunbelt Feed Yard falls in its industry

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except s establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 50 Beef cattle feedlots (except s employers in Kansas.

Sunbelt Feed Yard (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sunbelt Feed Yard
Sunbelt Feed Yard (33 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Sunbelt Feed Yard has fewer employees than the Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 10.8 5 0 0
2023 16.4 14.1 7 0 0
2022 13.1 13.1 5 0 0
2021 9.9 9.9 3 1 0
2020 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 11.6 8.7 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Hugoton

165 Beef cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 9 employers in Hugoton, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ZX Ranch - Paisley 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Eckley 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brawley, CA Farm Aviation 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookover Ranch Feedyard 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Royal Beef Feed Yard 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linn Willow Creek Dairy LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Upland Pork LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowe 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seaboard Energy Kansas, LLC 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Natural Gas Compressor Manufacture 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR KDI Operating Company 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Plains Gas Compression Holdings, LLC 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Duke Raleigh Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DOT 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Claude Howard Lumber Company 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-State Paving, LLC 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Teknor Thermoplastic Elastomers, Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Copperhead Chemical Company Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Printing Company 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA Warehouse 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.