Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · South Carolina

Greeneville Meyer

Greenville, SC · ~121 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greeneville Meyer runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Greeneville Meyer: 5.5 TCR = 165% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greeneville Meyer safety composite

Greeneville Meyer scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greeneville Meyer: 1.4 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 12.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2024

Greeneville Meyer's TCR rose 3.9 from 1.4 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 165% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO DRT Aerospace LLC Me…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DRT Aerospace LLC Meriden CT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greeneville Meyer in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greeneville Meyer averages 5.5 TCR (165% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greeneville Meyer TCR series: 2016=1.4 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=12.5 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=6.2 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Greeneville Meyer falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in South Carolina.

Greeneville Meyer (121 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Greeneville Meyer
Greeneville Meyer (121 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Greeneville Meyer has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 1.5 3 4 0
2023 6.2 4.7 6 2 0
2022 3.4 2.6 4 0 0
2021 4.8 2.4 6 0 0
2019 12.5 6.2 11 7 0
2018 4.6 4.6 6 0 0
2016 1.4 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · SC · Greenville

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DRT Aerospace LLC Meriden CT 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Dallas, TX 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HARCO LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Danville Metal Stamping 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metroplex (Charleston) 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piggly Wiggly #91 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowes Foods #233 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5371 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Morristown (OVC) 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR JX 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterproofing 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Northwest Greensboro 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE TTI- Houston Corporate 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE W D Townley & Son Lumber Co Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sycamore Creek Healthcare Group 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interiors Mason - Cleveland Construction 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.