Skilled nursing facilities · South Carolina

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home

Newberry, SC · ~121 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home: 12.1 TCR = 186% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home safety composite

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2016→2024

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home injury rate improved

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home's TCR fell 9.3 from 12.4 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 49.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=49.9 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Newberry, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #138/165
  • PHOTO Palm Village Retirem…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Palm Village Retirement Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home averages 12.1 TCR (186% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=49.9 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3 · BLS 6.5

Where J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 165 Skilled nursing facilities employers in South Carolina.

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home (121 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home
J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home (121 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2023 3.9 1.3 3 0 0
2022 11.4 11.4 3 7 0
2021 7.3 4.9 6 0 0
2020 49.9 49.9 2 28 0
2019 5.5 1.1 4 1 0
2018 8.4 2.8 4 2 0
2017 7.1 6.1 7 0 0
2016 12.4 7.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Newberry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 43 employers in Newberry, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Palm Village Retirement Community 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brackenville Center 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraday of Corpus Christi 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Care Center 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metroplex (Charleston) 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greeneville Meyer 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piggly Wiggly #91 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowes Foods #233 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 1,658 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samsung Electronics Home Appliances America LLC 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newberry County Memorial Hospital 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 624 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Keokuk Hills Beef Company LLC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Warehouse RET-TCP 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Win Soon Chicago, Inc 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mack Industries of Michigan 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gootee Construction, Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Opp Construction 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medilodge of Capital Area 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ivy Hall Nursing Home 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.