Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · Massachusetts

Greenfield-298 Federal Street

Greenfield, MA · ~87 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenfield-298 Federal Street runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Greenfield-298 Federal Street: 1.8 TCR = 47% of Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenfield-298 Federal Street safety composite

Greenfield-298 Federal Street scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Greenfield-298 Federal Street: 2.5 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2019

Greenfield-298 Federal Street's TCR rose 0.6 from 2.5 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Greenfield, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #6/52
  • PHOTO RSS - Wilson
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RSS - Wilson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Greenfield-298 Federal Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenfield-298 Federal Street averages 1.8 TCR (47% of the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenfield-298 Federal Street TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Greenfield-298 Federal Street falls in its industry

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 52 Drug addiction rehabilitation employers in Massachusetts.

Greenfield-298 Federal Street (87 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenfield-298 Federal Street
Greenfield-298 Federal Street (87 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Greenfield-298 Federal Street has more employees than the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.1 1.1 3 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MA · Greenfield

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 37 employers in Greenfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RSS - Wilson 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calabrese 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHR- New Life Center 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH CAROLINA REGION 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Management & Builders, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE D'Allessandro Corp. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE B-G Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE North shore mechanical contractors 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR BFMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR FMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWM - Greenfield, MA 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWM Intl. 261 FTE
NAT-TCR IL - Hostess 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Interiors And Structures Division 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Naders Pest Raiders Jacksonville 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Avalign Instruments and Implants 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CA - Disney / Ergotron (Formerly CA Commercial) 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-50CA500 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE SwedishAmerican Health System-9th Street Building 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoosier Tank & Manufacturing 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.