Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Oklahoma

Interiors And Structures Division

Tulsa, OK · ~674 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Interiors And Structures Division runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Interiors And Structures Division: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Interiors And Structures Division safety composite

Interiors And Structures Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Interiors And Structures Division: 1.2 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2019

Interiors And Structures Division's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #22/31
  • PHOTO Mingo Aerospace, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~674 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mingo Aerospace, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Interiors And Structures Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Interiors And Structures Division averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Interiors And Structures Division TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Interiors And Structures Division falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 31 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Oklahoma.

Interiors And Structures Division (674 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Interiors And Structures Division
Interiors And Structures Division (674 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Interiors And Structures Division has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.8 1.0 12 2 0
2018 1.3 0.7 9 0 0
2017 2.8 1.7 17 0 0
2016 1.2 0.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OK · Tulsa

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mingo Aerospace, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAE Systems I&S - Mojave 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HVAMA02 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALOFT AeroArchitects 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1855-OKTUL18 673 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tulsa General Ofc 672 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altus Plant 669 FTE
STATE-SIZE M-D Building Products 680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Naders Pest Raiders Jacksonville 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenfield-298 Federal Street 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet St Vincent Hosp Fans 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IL - Hostess 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MPLSMNDF 674 FTE
NAT-SIZE BRHMALOC 674 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blount Fine Foods-Fall River 674 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turner at Shell Chemical LP Geismar LA 674 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.