Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · South Carolina

Greenville Sequencing Center

Piedmont, SC · ~366 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenville Sequencing Center runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Greenville Sequencing Center: 3.4 TCR = 62% of Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenville Sequencing Center safety composite

Greenville Sequencing Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greenville Sequencing Center held a steady TCR band

Greenville Sequencing Center's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.0 in 2018 to 3.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Piedmont, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 62% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #18/30
  • PHOTO Ventra Kansas
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~366 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ventra Kansas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenville Sequencing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenville Sequencing Center averages 3.4 TCR (62% of the Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenville Sequencing Center TCR series: 2018=3 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.2 · BLS 5.4

Where Greenville Sequencing Center falls in its industry

772 Bumpers and bumperettes assemb establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 30 Bumpers and bumperettes assemb employers in South Carolina.

Greenville Sequencing Center (366 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenville Sequencing Center
Greenville Sequencing Center (366 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Greenville Sequencing Center has more employees than the Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.2 2.8 8 2 0
2020 3.4 3.0 9 1 0
2019 3.9 3.5 9 0 0
2018 3.0 2.9 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · SC · Piedmont

772 Bumpers and bumperettes assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 71 employers in Piedmont, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ventra Kansas 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valeo East Liberty 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR T.RAD North America, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Headquarters 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colgate Palmolive 366 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1183 366 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rivers Plumbing & Electric, Inc. 367 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestage Foods of SC LLC 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drive Automotive Industries of America 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Blood Connection 657 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - OGR Plant 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR C453 Greenville 372 FTE
NAT-TCR Cerro Wire - Crothersville 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Merit Construction Services, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Joy Cone Hermitage 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Athens Plant 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CCSF, ADM, City Administrator 366 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZOTA 366 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0648 - Maple Grove Mn Whse 366 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0407 - Tucson Az Whse 366 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.