Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) · South Carolina

GreenWood, Inc.

Greenville, SC · ~678 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GreenWood, Inc. runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade A.

GreenWood, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GreenWood, Inc. safety composite

GreenWood, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

GreenWood, Inc.: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.14× in 2024

GreenWood, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #11/37
  • PHOTO Thompson Constructio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~678 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thompson Construction Group Inc GE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

GreenWood, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GreenWood, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GreenWood, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 2.9

Where GreenWood, Inc. falls in its industry

924 Construction management, indus establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 37 Construction management, indus employers in South Carolina.

GreenWood, Inc. (678 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate GreenWood, Inc.
GreenWood, Inc. (678 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

GreenWood, Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, industrial buil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.7 4 1 0
2023 0.5 0.3 3 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 5 0 0
2021 0.9 0.6 6 0 0
2019 0.5 0.3 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · SC · Greenville

924 Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thompson Construction Group Inc GE 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACCO Portland 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8971-Chevron Oronite 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shimizu North America LLC 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moncks Corner Offuce 679 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benore Logistic Systems, Inc. - Greer 679 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eastover SC Mill 676 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Florence Factory 676 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR LivingSpace Sunrooms, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mel Clark Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mallick Mechanical Contractors Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardmore Bldg B 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jet Aviation Flight Services 678 FTE
NAT-SIZE Samaritan Medical Center 678 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sewon 678 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gap Inc. - Corporate Office - 55 Thomas 678 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.