Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing · Georgia

Sewon

Lagrange, GA · ~678 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sewon runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sewon: 2.6 TCR = 48% of Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sewon safety composite

Sewon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sewon: 2.3 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2024

Sewon's TCR rose 0.6 from 2.3 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Lagrange, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #7/20
  • PHOTO hago Automotive
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 169 inj
  • SIZE ~678 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: hago Automotive (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Sewon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sewon averages 2.6 TCR (48% of the Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sewon TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Sewon falls in its industry

510 Motor vehicle metal stampings establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 20 Motor vehicle metal stampings employers in Georgia.

Sewon (678 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Sewon
Sewon (678 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Sewon has more employees than the Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., bod median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.6 29 0 0
2023 2.2 0.9 21 0 0
2022 1.6 1.4 8 0 0
2021 3.5 1.6 18 0 0
2020 2.7 1.3 15 0 0
2019 2.8 0.2 17 0 0
2018 2.0 0.8 13 0 0
2017 3.5 0.7 26 0 0
2016 2.3 1.3 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · GA · Lagrange

510 Motor vehicle metal stampings (e.g., body parts, fenders, hub caps, tops, trim) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 110 employers in Lagrange, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR hago Automotive 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interplex Sunbelt (Medical) 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Assembly 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Bluffton 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Americold 3PL Atlanta 678 FTE
STATE-SIZE YKK (USA) Inc. 679 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spelman College 677 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piedmont Newton Hospital 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar West Georgia Medical Center 1,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6054 1,157 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6054 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Wolf Lodge 635 FTE
NAT-TCR Matrix Plastic Products, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R.W. Sauder Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ironwood Plastics 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant # 1 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Samaritan Medical Center 678 FTE
NAT-SIZE GreenWood, Inc. 678 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet Aviation Flight Services 678 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gap Inc. - Corporate Office - 55 Thomas 678 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.