Electric Power Distribution · South Carolina

Greenwood Operations Center

Greenwood, SC · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greenwood Operations Center runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

Greenwood Operations Center: 1.2 TCR = 100% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greenwood Operations Center safety composite

Greenwood Operations Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greenwood Operations Center held a steady TCR band

Greenwood Operations Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Greenwood, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.2 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/86
  • PHOTO SECO Energy - Corpor…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SECO Energy - Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greenwood Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greenwood Operations Center averages 1.2 TCR (100% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greenwood Operations Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Greenwood Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 86 Electric Power Distribution employers in South Carolina.

Greenwood Operations Center (30 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greenwood Operations Center
Greenwood Operations Center (30 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Greenwood Operations Center has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SC · Greenwood

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 102 employers in Greenwood, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SECO Energy - Corporate 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stratton 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PEC-Junction 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willcox Main Office 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FAIRFIELD PUMPED STORAGE HYDRO 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE DENMARK DISTRICT OFFICE 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center - PNG 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sod Farm 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Self Regional Healthcare 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lander University 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENWOOD LAURENS PDCA SC 716 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capsugel 693 FTE
NAT-TCR Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoeaz-Inc-Phoenix,Az - Arizona 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 17 - S Florida 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cascade Engineering 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Noblesville Generating Station 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Ridge Alz 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ivy Development Agency LLC 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.