Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing · North Carolina

Greif - Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greif - Charlotte runs at 371% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Greif - Charlotte: 12.3 TCR = 371% of Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greif - Charlotte safety composite

Greif - Charlotte scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.9

2019→2022

Greif - Charlotte injury rate improved

Greif - Charlotte's TCR fell 19.9 from 22.2 in 2019 to 2.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 22.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=22.2 · 2022=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322130 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 371% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO White Pigeon Paper C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White Pigeon Paper Company (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greif - Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greif - Charlotte averages 12.3 TCR (371% of the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greif - Charlotte TCR series: 2019=22.2 · 2022=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Greif - Charlotte falls in its industry

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto employers in North Carolina.

Greif - Charlotte (47 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greif - Charlotte
Greif - Charlotte (47 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Greif - Charlotte has fewer employees than the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, contai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 22.2 3.7 4 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322130 · NC · Charlotte

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White Pigeon Paper Company 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weidmann Electrical Technology, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3340 Eaton Mill 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monroe NC Operations 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River Steam Station 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Resource Center PNG 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Charlotte 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 258237-Roy-Madison Hts Carrier Anx 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 253900-Grand Ledge Po 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Villa at Lincoln Park 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Cheshire, Connecticut 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Camp Hill Distribution Center (Transportation, Processing, Outlet) 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1003 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG613 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG622 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.