Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing · New York

Greif Cheektowaga, NY

Cheektowaga, NY · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greif Cheektowaga, NY runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Greif Cheektowaga, NY: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greif Cheektowaga, NY safety composite

Greif Cheektowaga, NY scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2021→2022

Greif Cheektowaga, NY injury rate improved

Greif Cheektowaga, NY's TCR fell 7.5 from 7.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.5 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322130 · Cheektowaga, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P25
  • PHOTO Pratt (Target Contai…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt (Target Container), Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Greif Cheektowaga, NY in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greif Cheektowaga, NY averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greif Cheektowaga, NY TCR series: 2021=7.5 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Greif Cheektowaga, NY falls in its industry

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Greif Cheektowaga, NY (29 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Greif Cheektowaga, NY
Greif Cheektowaga, NY (29 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Greif Cheektowaga, NY has fewer employees than the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, contai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.5 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322130 · NY · Cheektowaga

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 150 employers in Cheektowaga, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Target Container), Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clearwater Paper Cypress Bend 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif/Caraustar 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clearwater Paper Lewiston PPD 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Ridge Dairy LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Canandaigua 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Norwich 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Buffalo 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Force 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sisters of Charity Hospital, St. Joseph Campus 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Visiting Nurses Association - Erie 407 FTE
NAT-TCR MedVet New Orleans 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gwinnett Operating - 1453 Highway 120 Lawrenceville 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft Pierce Division 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 9277-143 Summer-Breckenridge 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pavestone - DENB 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pavestone - PUBB 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-276-Pottery Barn 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-281-Pottery Barn 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.