Garages, general automotive repair (except gasoline service stations) · Texas

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center

Dallas, TX · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garages, general automotive repair (except gasoline service stations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center: 5.3 TCR = 252% of Garages, general automotive repair (except gasoline service stations) BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center safety composite

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2019→2023

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center injury rate improved

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center's TCR fell 3.6 from 9.2 in 2019 to 5.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811111 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 252% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #29/38
  • PHOTO IMC Buffalo
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IMC Buffalo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center averages 5.3 TCR (252% of the Garages, general automotive repair (except gasoline service stations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center TCR series: 2019=9.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=5.6 · BLS 2.1

Where Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center falls in its industry

609 Garages, general automotive re establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 38 Garages, general automotive re employers in Texas.

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center (60 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center
Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center (60 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Greyhound Dallas Maintenance Center has more employees than the Garages, general automotive repair (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.6 1.4 4 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2019 9.2 5.1 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811111 · TX · Dallas

609 Garages, general automotive repair (except gasoline service stations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IMC Buffalo 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American National Fleet Service Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WOODBURY 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bristol Equipment Shop 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedlot Dublin LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 1 Complex 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACRT, Inc. Arlington TX 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VES Survey International 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Emerald Packing Company LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilchrist Forest Products, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Huckleberry's #635 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northridge Construction, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Fairview 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oliver & Company 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&D Heating and Air Conditioning, LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guardian Water and Power 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.