Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) · Pennsylvania

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA

Name: Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Pittsburgh, PA · ~60 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 5.3
Avg TCR: 4.5
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade C.

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA: 5.3 TCR = 117% of Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA safety composite

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers
DART rate: F 8.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA held a steady TCR band

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA's TCR held near 0.2 from 7.8 in 2019 to 8.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485113 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 117% of ind

DART 8.0 DART
RANK #5/8
PHOTO 2662-7031
BOOK 3y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2662-7031 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

5.3
2662-7031

5.3
55473 Lorain C

5.3
9009 SHUTTLE-B

5.3
Yuma County Ar

5.2

What this shows Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA averages 5.3 TCR (117% of the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA TCR series: 2019=7.8 · 2020=0 · 2022=8 · BLS 4.5

Where Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA falls in its industry

332 Bus transit systems (except mi establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Bus transit systems (except mi employers in Pennsylvania.

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA (60 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Greyhound Lines, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA has fewer employees than the Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2022	8.0	8.0	1	1
2020	0.0	0.0	0	0
2019	7.8	5.2	3	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485113 · PA · Pittsburgh

332 Bus transit systems (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	2662-7031	COLORADO SPRINGS, CO	5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	55473 Lorain County	ELYRIA, OH	5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	9009 SHUTTLE-BOSTON	BOSTON, MA	5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Yuma County Area Tansit (YCAT) RATP Dev Yuma	YUMA, AZ	5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	PHRG PIT	CORAOPOLIS	60 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wickersham Construction & Engineering, Inc.	LANCASATER	60 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Landau Building Company	WEXFORD	60 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Division #23	DUNMORE	60 FTE
CITY-NEAR	United States Steel COrporation	Pittsburgh	15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Pittsburgh- Oakland	Pittsburgh	14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH)	Pittsburgh	13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Pittsburgh-Oakland	Pittsburgh	13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR	Holt and Bugbee Co.	Tewksbury, MA	5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bed Bath and Beyond Daytona Beach	Daytona Beach, FL	5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Syar Industries - Lake Herman Quarry	Vallejo, CA	5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Azura Memory Care of Oconomowoc	Oconomowoc, WI	5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	IHG Army Hotels - Fort Gordon (Holiday Inn Express/Army Lodging)	Augusta, GA	60 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Poseidon Advanced Materials	Slater, SC	60 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Transit Mgmt. of Abilene, CityLink	Abilene, TX	60 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Linx Wheeling Office	Wheeling, WV	60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.