Employer · New York

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only)

Rochester, NY · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only): 5.6 TCR = 267% of industry BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) safety composite

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2016→2018

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) injury rate improved

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only)'s TCR fell 9.3 from 11.9 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 267% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #51/67
  • PHOTO Northeast Asphalt, I…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northeast Asphalt, Inc. - Shop (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) averages 5.6 TCR (267% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) TCR series: 2016=11.9 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.6 · BLS 2.1

Where Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) falls in its industry

2,560 industry establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 67 industry employers in New York.

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) (50 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only)
Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) (50 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Grid Solutions : CS NAM - North America Services (US Only) has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2017 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 11.9 6.0 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NY · Rochester

2,560 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northeast Asphalt, Inc. - Shop 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buffalo - Penn Power Group 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syar Industries - Napa Shop 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Parts - Lombard 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Chief Buildings Rensselaer 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NorthChase Nursing & Rehab 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR San Leandro Ca (Washington Ave) Depot 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE QSI Waldron 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE MS - Wahiawa, HI - 5AFW3 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends - Tampa Yankees 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirlin Mechanical Services 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.