Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Texas

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation

Irving, TX · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation: 5.6 TCR = 170% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation safety composite

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2018

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation injury rate improved

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation's TCR fell 6.1 from 8.7 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Irving, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 170% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO St.Marys Tool & Die.…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St.Marys Tool & Die. Co.,Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation averages 5.6 TCR (170% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Texas.

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation (35 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation
Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation (35 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Irving, Texas Container Graphics Corporation has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 8.7 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · TX · Irving

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 548 employers in Irving, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St.Marys Tool & Die. Co.,Inc 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renishaw Fixturing Solutions 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo Ohio Container Graphics Corporation 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trueline 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR 50CP001 CORP LAS COLINAS 4,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXC101551 2,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCH Corporation 2727 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RBD5 1,964 FTE
NAT-TCR San Leandro Ca (Washington Ave) Depot 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NorthChase Nursing & Rehab 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix-N-Peace #1 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 366 ABC Supply Co., Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Dorado Branch 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Dow Chemical Company - Joliet, IL 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard St Petersburg/Clearwater 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carmel Village Memory Care 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.