Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Arizona

Griffith Energy LLC

Golden Valley, AZ · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Griffith Energy LLC runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade A.

Griffith Energy LLC: 0.5 TCR = 40% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Griffith Energy LLC safety composite

Griffith Energy LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Griffith Energy LLC held a steady TCR band

Griffith Energy LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Golden Valley, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Riverton Power Station
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riverton Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Griffith Energy LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Griffith Energy LLC averages 0.5 TCR (40% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Griffith Energy LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Griffith Energy LLC falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Arizona.

Griffith Energy LLC (23 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Griffith Energy LLC
Griffith Energy LLC (23 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Griffith Energy LLC has fewer employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AZ · Golden Valley

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 8 employers in Golden Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riverton Power Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Steam Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00701 BRIDGER COAL COMPANY SF MINE 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ontelaunee Power Operating Company LLC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nakase Brothers Wholesale Nursery AZ 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eloy Farm 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClintock Dairy, LLP - MDL266 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coolidge 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4238-267 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Trucking, Inc AZ 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Interstate Warehousing - Kingman 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR ConRoc Ready Mix, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Grant Sheet Metal 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakland BNSF 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Esperson 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Administrative Offices 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wahle'S Wood Works & Mouldings, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recoveron Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schroeder-Manatee Ranch, Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hirel Systems Duluth Mn 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.