Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Kansas

Riverton Power Station

Riverton, KS · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverton Power Station runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Riverton Power Station: 0.5 TCR = 40% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverton Power Station safety composite

Riverton Power Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Riverton Power Station held a steady TCR band

Riverton Power Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Riverton, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 40% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Griffith Energy LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Griffith Energy LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Riverton Power Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverton Power Station averages 0.5 TCR (40% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverton Power Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Riverton Power Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Electric power generation, fos employers in Kansas.

Riverton Power Station (24 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverton Power Station
Riverton Power Station (24 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Riverton Power Station has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · KS · Riverton

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Griffith Energy LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marshall Steam Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00701 BRIDGER COAL COMPANY SF MINE 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ontelaunee Power Operating Company LLC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Satanta Farms North #1 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Feedlot Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crop Service Center Inc 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ag Connection Sales, Inc 24 FTE
NAT-TCR HNJFP01 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lee Building Products (Murfreesboro) 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilson Machine and Tool, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Center- Headquarter Employees 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Empire Truck Sales - Meridian 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stribling Equipment - Memphis 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miami-Cass REMC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland REMC - Wabash District 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.