Commercial building construction general contractors · Tennessee

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc

Memphis, TN · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc safety composite

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc held a steady TCR band

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Memphis, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/95
  • PHOTO Tripp Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tripp Enterprises Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 95 Commercial building constructi employers in Tennessee.

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc (58 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc
Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc (58 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · TN · Memphis

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tripp Enterprises Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Construction 2016 OSHA 300 & 300A 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tepcon Construction Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Houston 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8018174 - 1903 Terminal Lobby and IAF 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walker Building Group LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE REMBCO GEOTECHNICAL 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rackley Roofing East 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SpringHill Suites by Marriott Boise 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Resthaven Nursing Home 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Missouri Community Improvement Industries, Inc (MCII) 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lone Star Coaches, Inc. 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.