Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

Grizzly Construction, Inc

Clovis, CA · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grizzly Construction, Inc runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Grizzly Construction, Inc: 1.8 TCR = 63% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grizzly Construction, Inc safety composite

Grizzly Construction, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Grizzly Construction, Inc held a steady TCR band

Grizzly Construction, Inc's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.3 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Clovis, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 63% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #56/201
  • PHOTO Precon Corporation
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precon Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Grizzly Construction, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grizzly Construction, Inc averages 1.8 TCR (63% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grizzly Construction, Inc TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Grizzly Construction, Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

Grizzly Construction, Inc (25 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Grizzly Construction, Inc
Grizzly Construction, Inc (25 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Grizzly Construction, Inc has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Clovis

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 125 employers in Clovis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precon Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hughes Brothers Construction Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR pan oceanic engineering 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clovis Community Medical Ctr 2,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica - Clovis 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Clovis 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enhanced Landscape Management 510 FTE
NAT-TCR LO Agronomy 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Alabama (60) 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cabinetworks Group Middlefield Plant #3 Orwell 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ineos Pigment, Plant 2 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hills Food Store #1 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freightliner of Lebanon 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citizens Ambulance Service Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.