Physicians', mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · California

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC

Spring Valley, CA · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physicians', mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade F.

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC: 11.3 TCR = 298% of Physicians', mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC safety composite

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2017→2024

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC injury rate improved

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC's TCR fell 10.0 from 22.5 in 2017 to 12.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=22.5 · 2018=12.0 · 2019=6.0 · 2021=12.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=12.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621112 · Spring Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 298% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/61
  • PHOTO Coon Rapids AMC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coon Rapids AMC (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC averages 11.3 TCR (298% of the Physicians', mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC TCR series: 2017=22.5 · 2018=12 · 2019=6 · 2021=12.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=12.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC falls in its industry

269 Physicians', mental health, of establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 61 Physicians', mental health, of employers in California.

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC (50 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC
Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC (50 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Grossmonth Spring Valley FHC has fewer employees than the Physicians', mental health, offices (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.6 0.0 5 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 12.6 2.1 6 0 0
2019 6.0 2.0 3 0 0
2018 12.0 8.0 6 0 0
2017 22.5 13.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621112 · CA · Spring Valley

269 Physicians', mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 56 employers in Spring Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coon Rapids AMC 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evans GA 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairborn OH 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABA Interventions, LLC 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 368 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Living at Mount Miguel 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOUNT MIGUEL COVENANT VILLAGE 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casper Company 180 FTE
NAT-TCR North Country Distributors, Inc. 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Paleteras Unidas Inc 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bayhead Products Corp 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamond D Farm 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industrial Bolt & Supply, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE BJB Architectural Metal Services 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE BioWorks 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Resin Supply, LLC 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.