Face creams (e.g., cleansing, moisturizing) manufacturing · California

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc.

Livermore, CA · ~121 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Face creams (e.g., cleansing, moisturizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Face creams (e.g., cleansing, moisturizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. safety composite

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc.: 0.0 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.97× in 2024

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 4.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #7/38
  • PHOTO Procter and Gamble T…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Procter and Gamble Tabler Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Face creams (e.g., cleansing, moisturizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. falls in its industry

260 Face creams (e.g., cleansing, establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 38 Face creams (e.g., cleansing, employers in California.

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. (121 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc.
G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. (121 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

G.S. Cosmeceutical USA, Inc. has fewer employees than the Face creams (e.g., cleansing, moisturizi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2023 3.6 2.7 1 3 0
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · CA · Livermore

260 Face creams (e.g., cleansing, moisturizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Procter and Gamble Tabler Station 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KIK Custom Products 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Tech Laboratories LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Naumann Ranch 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illume Agriculture, LLC 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Miramar Yard 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Collier Road Complex 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Building Service Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BASF Corporation - St. Louis Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DataScan 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Joseph Tavone Incorporated 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mr. Excavator, Inc 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davie Management 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Retail Acquisition & Development 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Restoration Specialty Services INC 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.