Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · California

GSE Construction Mountain Division

Livermore, CA · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GSE Construction Mountain Division runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade C.

GSE Construction Mountain Division: 2.7 TCR = 95% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GSE Construction Mountain Division safety composite

GSE Construction Mountain Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2022→2024

GSE Construction Mountain Division injury rate improved

GSE Construction Mountain Division's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.1 in 2022 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.1 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 95% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #93/201
  • PHOTO Iron Horse Excavatin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Iron Horse Excavating, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

GSE Construction Mountain Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GSE Construction Mountain Division averages 2.7 TCR (95% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GSE Construction Mountain Division TCR series: 2022=4.1 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where GSE Construction Mountain Division falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 201 Construction management, water employers in California.

GSE Construction Mountain Division (71 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GSE Construction Mountain Division
GSE Construction Mountain Division (71 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

GSE Construction Mountain Division has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Livermore

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Iron Horse Excavating, Inc 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works Constructors, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydro Resources, West 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Location 3 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE M Pineda Farming Co 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE AgSource Services, LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schafer Ranch, Inc 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & J Dondero Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Weifield Group Contracting 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lensing Wholesale Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 3316 - Provo State St and Bulldog Blvd UT 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlie C's IGA #740 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE KRS Holdings Inc 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wildcat Renovation LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Germains Cabinet 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Country Club of Naples, Inc 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.