ALL printing operations including digital printing · California

GSL Fine Lithographers

Sacramento, CA · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GSL Fine Lithographers runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical ALL printing operations including digital printing workplace, earning a grade A.

GSL Fine Lithographers: 0.8 TCR = 25% of ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GSL Fine Lithographers safety composite

GSL Fine Lithographers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2019

GSL Fine Lithographers injury rate improved

GSL Fine Lithographers's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/150
  • PHOTO Hillsboro Preprint F…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hillsboro Preprint Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

GSL Fine Lithographers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GSL Fine Lithographers averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the ALL printing operations including digital printing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GSL Fine Lithographers TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where GSL Fine Lithographers falls in its industry

2,001 ALL printing operations includ establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 150 ALL printing operations includ employers in California.

GSL Fine Lithographers (35 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate GSL Fine Lithographers
GSL Fine Lithographers (35 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

GSL Fine Lithographers has fewer employees than the ALL printing operations including digita median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · CA · Sacramento

2,001 ALL printing operations including digital printing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hillsboro Preprint Facility 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primary Color LLC - Dallas 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sticker Mule, LLC - Edson Street 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Source3Media 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR US MD Hagerstown Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida MicroElectronics Hill Ave 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Concrete of South Carolina Coastal office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Multi-Pure International 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vo Wv Beckley Waiver Clinical 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE True World Foods Atlanta LLC. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE US NY Plainview Coml 4375 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alaska Regional Hospital - CNS 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.