Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Ohio

GT Technologies, Toledo

Toledo, OH · ~83 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GT Technologies, Toledo runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

GT Technologies, Toledo: 5.4 TCR = 100% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GT Technologies, Toledo safety composite

GT Technologies, Toledo scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2023

GT Technologies, Toledo injury rate improved

GT Technologies, Toledo's TCR fell 2.1 from 5.7 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Toledo, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 100% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #60/94
  • PHOTO Masterguard
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Masterguard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

GT Technologies, Toledo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GT Technologies, Toledo averages 5.4 TCR (100% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GT Technologies, Toledo TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=7 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=7 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 5.4

Where GT Technologies, Toledo falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 94 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Ohio.

GT Technologies, Toledo (83 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate GT Technologies, Toledo
GT Technologies, Toledo (83 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

GT Technologies, Toledo has fewer employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2022 7.9 5.3 6 0 0
2021 7.0 1.4 5 0 0
2020 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 5.7 4.6 5 0 0
2018 3.2 2.1 3 0 0
2017 7.0 1.2 4 2 0
2016 5.7 2.3 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · OH · Toledo

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 551 employers in Toledo, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Masterguard 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fukai Toyotetsu Indiana Corporation 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Clinton Township 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Euclid Manufacturing 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE A1 Egg Farm 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dew Fresh Egg Farm 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEP Eggs 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Egg Products 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Assembly Complex 5,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Toledo Hospital 5,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Promedica Downtown Headquarters 3,308 FTE
NAT-TCR Trucchi's Supermarket #6 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1938 TEMECULA, CA 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Valdosta Plant Scruggs Concrete 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversicare of Tylertown 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kretz Lumber Co., Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE BTA Oil Producers, LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyckoff Heating and Cooling 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE BG Products Wichita Manufacturing Facility 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.