Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Euclid Manufacturing

Detroit, MI · ~233 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Euclid Manufacturing runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Euclid Manufacturing: 5.4 TCR = 100% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Euclid Manufacturing safety composite

Euclid Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2024

Euclid Manufacturing injury rate improved

Euclid Manufacturing's TCR fell 7.7 from 9.1 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2017=9.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #92/165
  • PHOTO Misa Metal Processin…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Misa Metal Processing Birmingham, Alabama (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Euclid Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Euclid Manufacturing averages 5.4 TCR (100% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Euclid Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=9.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=6 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 5.4

Where Euclid Manufacturing falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 165 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Michigan.

Euclid Manufacturing (233 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Euclid Manufacturing
Euclid Manufacturing (233 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Euclid Manufacturing has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 3 0 0
2023 1.8 1.1 5 0 0
2022 6.0 2.1 14 0 0
2021 5.5 0.5 9 1 0
2019 4.5 2.8 13 0 0
2017 9.6 8.2 25 2 0
2016 9.1 4.5 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Detroit

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Misa Metal Processing Birmingham, Alabama 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fukai Toyotetsu Indiana Corporation 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masterguard 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GT Technologies, Toledo 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CertainTeed 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE StageRight Corporation / Rogers Group 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purem by Eberspaecher North America - Wixom 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6301 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alleguard - Cave Spring 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Hood Systems 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Patriot Beverages 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gless Ranch, Inc 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Catherine's Village 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quietflex Manufacturing Company, L.P.- Groveland Florida 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indorama Ventures Sustainable Solutions LLC 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.