Skilled nursing facilities · Minnesota

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center

Hibbing, MN · ~121 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center: 18.3 TCR = 282% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center: 12.9 → 14.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 39.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 1.4 from 12.9 in 2016 to 14.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 39.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hibbing, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 282% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #388/430
  • PHOTO Avantara Billings
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avantara Billings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 18.3 TCR (282% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=12.9 · 2017=22.1 · 2018=12.2 · 2019=18 · 2020=39.7 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=14.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #388 safest of 430 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Minnesota.

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center (121 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center
Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center (121 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.4 8.0 9 0 0
2022 9.1 3.0 6 0 0
2020 39.7 39.7 3 29 0
2019 18.0 10.1 9 7 0
2018 12.2 11.1 10 1 0
2017 22.1 16.6 19 1 0
2016 12.9 12.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Hibbing

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 53 employers in Hibbing, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avantara Billings 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHC Healthcare St. Charles 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak View Home 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Countryside Convalescent Home LP 18.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Civil Group 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE PW-Transportation Project Delivery 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meyer Contracting Inc. 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson Anderson 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV - Range Medical Center 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2937 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR L&M Radiator 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2937 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Monterey Court Memory Care 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Carriage House Senior Living 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Precison Delivery LLC. 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SSA Garden Grove Regional Center 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eliason Industries, aka Senneca Holdings 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paddywax, LLC Factory 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE JVS Contracting Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Leaf Healthcare Center 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.