Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Carriage House Senior Living

Greensboro, NC · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carriage House Senior Living runs at 483% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carriage House Senior Living: 18.3 TCR = 483% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carriage House Senior Living safety composite

Carriage House Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carriage House Senior Living: 6.7 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 48.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2024

Carriage House Senior Living's TCR rose 2.0 from 6.7 in 2017 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 48.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 483% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #346/356
  • PHOTO Monterey Court Memor…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monterey Court Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carriage House Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carriage House Senior Living averages 18.3 TCR (483% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carriage House Senior Living TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2020=48.8 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Carriage House Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #346 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Carriage House Senior Living (70 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carriage House Senior Living
Carriage House Senior Living (70 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carriage House Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 5.8 3 0 0
2023 9.3 4.6 1 3 0
2020 48.8 47.2 3 27 0
2017 6.7 3.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Greensboro

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monterey Court Memory Care 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Pines Assisted Living 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentmoor Retirement Community 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Harrisburg 18.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SHARP FARM INC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jackson Farming Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACT Power Services, LLC 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Precison Delivery LLC. 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Guardian Angels Health and Rehabilitation Center 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Vending 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio-Kentucky Steel, LLC 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bedford Care Center of Petal 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tnlaw - Lawrenceburg 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kydan - Danville 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kysta - Stanton Center 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.