Election boards · North Carolina

Guilford County Elections

Name: Guilford County Elections Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Greensboro, NC · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 6.1
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Guilford County Elections runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Election boards workplace, earning a grade D.

Guilford County Elections: 6.1 TCR = 192% of Election boards BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Guilford County Elections safety composite

Guilford County Elections scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 6.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2018

Guilford County Elections injury rate improved

Guilford County Elections's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=16.3 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 192% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #81/105
PHOTO Plymouth Ice Center
BOOK 3y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plymouth Ice Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Building Servi

6.2
This site

6.1
Plymouth Ice C

6.1
Pender County

6.1
San Joaquin Co

6.1

What this shows Guilford County Elections averages 6.1 TCR (192% of the Election boards BLS benchmark).

Guilford County Elections TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=16.3 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Guilford County Elections falls in its industry

1,496 Election boards establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 105 Election boards employers in North Carolina.

Guilford County Elections (32 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Guilford County Elections has fewer employees than the Election boards median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	16.3	8.2	2
2016	2.1	2.1	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · NC · Greensboro

1,496 Election boards employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Plymouth Ice Center	PLYMOUTH, MN	6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pender County Government	BURGAW, NC	6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Building Services and Maintainence Shop	CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA	6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	San Joaquin County Facilities Management Department	STOCKTON, CA	6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	T.C. Smith Produce Farm	SEVEN SPRINGS	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC	MONROE	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC	WENDELL	32 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery	DUDLEY	32 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital	Greensboro	3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Guilford County Local Government - All Employees	Greensboro	3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Guilford County Local Government	Greensboro	3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB	Greensboro	2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR	UCI Syracuse	Syracuse, NY	6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	MRP South Hill, LLC	Spokane, WA	6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Tmx2146 - Tampa Commercial	Tampa, FL	6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	4769-6093-West Elm	Alpharetta, GA	6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Shopko Hometown #561 (Cokato, MN)	Cokato, MN	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Shopko Hometown #607 (Seymour, WI)	Seymour, WI	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Center for Resource Conservation	Boulder, CO	32 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Stable Foundations, LLC	Ashland, VA	32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.