Marine construction · Florida

Gulf and East Coast Construction

Jacksonville, FL · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gulf and East Coast Construction runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Marine construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Gulf and East Coast Construction: 2.1 TCR = 74% of Marine construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gulf and East Coast Construction safety composite

Gulf and East Coast Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Gulf and East Coast Construction held a steady TCR band

Gulf and East Coast Construction's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.9 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/60
  • PHOTO Tutor Perini/O&G Joi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tutor Perini/O&G Joint Venture PL2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Gulf and East Coast Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gulf and East Coast Construction averages 2.1 TCR (74% of the Marine construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gulf and East Coast Construction TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Gulf and East Coast Construction falls in its industry

932 Marine construction establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 60 Marine construction employers in Florida.

Gulf and East Coast Construction (72 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gulf and East Coast Construction
Gulf and East Coast Construction (72 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Gulf and East Coast Construction has more employees than the Marine construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.1 4.5 8 0 0
2020 3.7 2.2 5 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.9 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · FL · Jacksonville

932 Marine construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tutor Perini/O&G Joint Venture PL2 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schnabel Foundation Company 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ballard - Midwest/RSD 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Construction, Inc-NY-Rockaway Beach 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rays Heritage LLC. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tradewinds Power Corp 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Estate General Contractors LLC. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE ESA South, Inc 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Houston Brothers Waterproofing, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Future Mold Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas City Power Plant 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Penfield 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Plating, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. R. Kelly Company, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3018 Keystone 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynn Mayer's Great Lakes Glads, Inc. 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.