Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Texas

Texas City Power Plant

Texas City, TX · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texas City Power Plant runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

Texas City Power Plant: 2.1 TCR = 173% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texas City Power Plant safety composite

Texas City Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Texas City Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Texas City Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Texas City, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 173% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #61/86
  • PHOTO V.I. Water & Power A…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: V.I. Water & Power Authority Harley Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Texas City Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texas City Power Plant averages 2.1 TCR (173% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texas City Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Texas City Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 86 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Texas.

Texas City Power Plant (23 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Texas City Power Plant
Texas City Power Plant (23 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Texas City Power Plant has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Texas City

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 81 employers in Texas City, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR V.I. Water & Power Authority Harley Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spruance Genco,LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR V.I. Water & Power Authority Richmond Plant 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Handley Station 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galveston Bay Refinery 1,677 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Eye Associates (TC) 616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valero Refining Company - Texas City 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA HOUSTON HEALTHCARE MAINLAND 440 FTE
NAT-TCR Gulf and East Coast Construction 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PGP Evansville 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston Brothers Waterproofing, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Future Mold Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sutter Energy Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 049 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hill-Air Heating & Air, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rapp Road 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.