Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) · Michigan

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc

Augusta, MI · ~246 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) workplace, earning a grade D.

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc: 5.2 TCR = 173% of Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc safety composite

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2019

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc injury rate improved

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc's TCR fell 2.2 from 6.3 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.3 · 2019=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Augusta, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 173% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #94/144
  • PHOTO Gilford TownePlace S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~246 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gilford TownePlace Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc averages 5.2 TCR (173% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc TCR series: 2018=6.3 · 2019=4.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 144 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Michigan.

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc (246 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc
Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc (246 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Gull Lake View Golf Club, Inc has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.1 3.1 4 0 0
2018 6.3 1.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MI · Augusta

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gilford TownePlace Suites 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence Inn by Marriott San Juan Isla Verde 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Beach Gardens Marriott 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radisson - La Crosse 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Christman Constructors, Inc - Michigan 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seneca Foods 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Operations - Auburn Plant 246 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairview 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-806 63 FTE
NAT-TCR Senior Care at Stephenville 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0031 1646 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Grocers # 133 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops 268 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iad 1059 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Mason City 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vernay Manufacturing Griffin Georgia 246 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Joseph Mount Sterling 246 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.