Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation

Clarkesville, GA · ~95 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation runs at 308% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation: 3.7 TCR = 308% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation safety composite

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2021

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation injury rate improved

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation's TCR fell 4.6 from 6.6 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Clarkesville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.7 · 308% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/149
  • PHOTO 12628 E 75 N, Loogoo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 12628 E 75 N, Loogootee, IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Habersham Electric Membership Corporation averages 3.7 TCR (308% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2 · BLS 1.2

Where Habersham Electric Membership Corporation falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation (95 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Habersham Electric Membership Corporation
Habersham Electric Membership Corporation (95 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Habersham Electric Membership Corporation has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 1 1 0
2017 7.1 3.0 6 1 0
2016 6.6 2.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Clarkesville

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 13 employers in Clarkesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 12628 E 75 N, Loogootee, IN 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Satilla REMC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 13101 SEPULVEDA 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Division Oak Grove Office 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hart EMC, Hartwell Office 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMMEC Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graves Electrical Services 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical Contractor Inc. 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 428 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSG Scovill 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morito Scovill 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Habersham EMC 107 FTE
NAT-TCR 42431i - South Bend in Dc 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cowin Equipment - Mobile 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1001 Sullivan 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OakBend Medical Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hobart & William Smith Col-Com 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA Field 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5507 Toledo Manufacturing 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imperial Blades 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.