Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation

Vidalia, GA · ~95 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation: 11.9 TCR = 183% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation: 1.5 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 37.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.29× in 2024

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.5 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 37.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Vidalia, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.9 · 183% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #175/259
  • PHOTO Hamilton Manor Nursi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hamilton Manor Nursing Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation averages 11.9 TCR (183% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=29 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=37.1 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #175 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation (95 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation
Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation (95 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Meadows Park Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2023 13.8 13.8 1 10 0
2022 37.1 37.1 1 25 0
2021 16.3 16.3 0 11 0
2020 29.0 29.0 0 20 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2016 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Vidalia

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 42 employers in Vidalia, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hamilton Manor Nursing Home 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dexter Health Care 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR JESUP HEALTH AND REHAB 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lahser Hills Care Centre 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Habersham Electric Membership Corporation 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hart EMC, Hartwell Office 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMMEC Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graves Electrical Services 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Vidalia, GA-USA 920 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 864 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR 864 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR PJVIDALIA: Vidalia GA - 3759 McIntosh 239 FTE
NAT-TCR 2177 - North Aurora 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sawing and Shearing Services, Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD047 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MNM020 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE PetroCard Inc Kent 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE KI High Point, NC Plant 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE SupplyOne Philadelphia 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mansfield Oh 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.