Retirement communities, continuing care · Arizona

Hacienda at The River

Tucson, AZ · ~74 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hacienda at The River runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Hacienda at The River: 7.0 TCR = 184% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hacienda at The River safety composite

Hacienda at The River scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2024

Hacienda at The River injury rate improved

Hacienda at The River's TCR fell 1.7 from 6.5 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.5 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 184% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #55/109
  • PHOTO GOLDEN OAKS VILLAGE …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GOLDEN OAKS VILLAGE OF STILLWATER, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Hacienda at The River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hacienda at The River averages 7.0 TCR (184% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hacienda at The River TCR series: 2017=6.5 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Hacienda at The River falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 109 Retirement communities, contin employers in Arizona.

Hacienda at The River (74 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hacienda at The River
Hacienda at The River (74 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Hacienda at The River has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2022 6.6 2.2 3 0 0
2021 10.4 0.0 4 0 0
2020 8.8 8.8 7 0 0
2019 6.4 0.9 7 0 0
2018 8.9 5.0 9 0 0
2017 6.5 6.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Tucson

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GOLDEN OAKS VILLAGE OF STILLWATER, LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landing at Poughkeepsie 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Topeka 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stiles Apartments at The Glen 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Piazzo Dairy, LLC - PDL601 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agave Solar 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCR Inc dba Petra Contracting 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Furtmann Bros LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Centerline Striping Co., Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert B Our Company Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Galleria Park Hotel 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HPD Consolidation, Inc. dba Valley Wine Warehouse 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE State Street - Schenectady 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCJD 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birmingham Office 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Azusa Distribution Center 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.