Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · North Carolina

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP

Highpoint, NC · ~297 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP safety composite

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP: 1.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2023

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.0 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Highpoint, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Layton Facility
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~297 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Layton Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP TCR series: 2016=1 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in North Carolina.

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP (297 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP
HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP (297 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

HAECO Cabin Solutions - PTP has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 1.5 6 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 2.7 0.9 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2019 1.9 1.7 8 0 0
2018 1.8 0.3 5 0 0
2016 1.0 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · NC · Highpoint

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 5 employers in Highpoint, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Layton Facility 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airframe Systems : Niles 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Rotorcraft - CO 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Miami Gardens FL) 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bakkavor USA 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITG Richmond 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global - Matthews 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardagh Glass Inc Henderson 297 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthCare High Point 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haworth Inc-Highpoint 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triad Warehouse 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toddwood Mfg. Inc. 19 FTE
NAT-TCR Pick Quick Foods Store# 448 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shawmut Advertising Inc 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Allan Construction, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Frank I. Rounds Co. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE County of Barry d/b/a Thornapple Manor 297 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 80/R2/T7 297 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lydig Construction 297 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mortex Products, Inc. 297 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.