Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · North Carolina

HAECO Special Services

Greensboro, NC · ~218 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HAECO Special Services runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

HAECO Special Services: 4.0 TCR = 89% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HAECO Special Services safety composite

HAECO Special Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

HAECO Special Services held a steady TCR band

HAECO Special Services's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2018=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #22/35
  • PHOTO DEN
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~218 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DEN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

HAECO Special Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HAECO Special Services averages 4.0 TCR (89% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HAECO Special Services TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2018=3.9 · BLS 4.5

Where HAECO Special Services falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 35 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in North Carolina.

HAECO Special Services (218 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HAECO Special Services
HAECO Special Services (218 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

HAECO Special Services has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.9 2.6 12 0 0
2016 4.2 2.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · NC · Greensboro

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DEN 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Miami 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DI - NAWDC Fallon 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkel Corporation Salisbury, NC 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cree LED, InC. 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGSP-W528 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Process Solutions - NC45 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR CM Whitins 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Contoocook 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairview Nursing Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Specialty Industries, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saginaw (Misag) 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-EJ-20730203-MX 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE BTD Manufacturing Dawsonville 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 12 218 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.