Lighting fixtures, institutional electric, manufacturing · Georgia

Halco Lighting Technologies

Norcross, GA · ~83 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Halco Lighting Technologies runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Lighting fixtures, institutional electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Halco Lighting Technologies: 5.2 TCR = 159% of Lighting fixtures, institutional electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Halco Lighting Technologies safety composite

Halco Lighting Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2024

Halco Lighting Technologies injury rate improved

Halco Lighting Technologies's TCR fell 2.2 from 15.4 in 2017 to 13.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.4 · 2019=0.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=13.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335122 · Norcross, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 159% of ind

  • DART 13.2 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Swarovski Lighting Ltd
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Swarovski Lighting Ltd (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Halco Lighting Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Halco Lighting Technologies averages 5.2 TCR (159% of the Lighting fixtures, institutional electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Halco Lighting Technologies TCR series: 2017=15.4 · 2019=0.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=13.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Halco Lighting Technologies falls in its industry

98 Lighting fixtures, institution establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Lighting fixtures, institution employers in Georgia.

Halco Lighting Technologies (83 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Halco Lighting Technologies
Halco Lighting Technologies (83 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Halco Lighting Technologies has fewer employees than the Lighting fixtures, institutional electri median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.2 13.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 15.4 15.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335122 · GA · Norcross

98 Lighting fixtures, institutional electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 337 employers in Norcross, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Swarovski Lighting Ltd 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dekko - Garrett 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSI Pole Plant 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BK Lighting Inc. 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Transmission Support, P&C Field Services, Maintenance/Reliability - 160 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC NW Metro Regional Bussiness Center 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Georgia Concrete, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coreslab Structures (Atlanta), Inc. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 1,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ole Mexican Foods, Norcross 6585 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6585 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPA ATLANTA 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Hershey Excavating, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wine & Roses Hotel Restaurant Spa 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kraft South Assembly & Distribution 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Faberkin, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tribal Manufacturing MI 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company - Dallas 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ontario Terminal 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Container Hattiesburg 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.