Skilled nursing facilities · South Carolina

Hallmark Healthcare Center

Summerville, SC · ~101 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hallmark Healthcare Center runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Hallmark Healthcare Center: 5.0 TCR = 77% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hallmark Healthcare Center safety composite

Hallmark Healthcare Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2016→2021

Hallmark Healthcare Center injury rate improved

Hallmark Healthcare Center's TCR fell 8.0 from 9.4 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 54.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=54.0 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Summerville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 5.0 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #70/165
  • PHOTO Encore Healthcare an…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Encore Healthcare and Rehab Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hallmark Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hallmark Healthcare Center averages 5.0 TCR (77% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hallmark Healthcare Center TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=54 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Hallmark Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 165 Skilled nursing facilities employers in South Carolina.

Hallmark Healthcare Center (101 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hallmark Healthcare Center
Hallmark Healthcare Center (101 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Hallmark Healthcare Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 1.5 0 1 0
2020 54.0 54.0 17 20 0
2019 6.1 6.1 5 0 0
2018 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2017 6.8 2.3 6 0 0
2016 9.4 2.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Summerville

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 188 employers in Summerville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Encore Healthcare and Rehab Center 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehab - Hinsdale 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cerenity Senior Care Marian of St Paul 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BP Dragonslayer Charleston SC - BSL 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClancy 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC220 Spartanburg Container 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transcontinental Packaging Spartanburg 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thorne research - Omni one 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scout Boats, Inc 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summerville Medical Center 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1037 420 FTE
NAT-TCR SCVHHS, Public Health (410) 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 7371-Enphg-Bucknell University 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aultman Hospital - Main (Canton) 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamond Manufacturing of Bluffton 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bristol ID Technologies (Lima) 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Werner Enterprises/DALTX Terminal 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaspros 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laddawn, Inc. Sterling, MA 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.