Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc.

Wixom, MI · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. runs at 418% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc.: 13.8 TCR = 418% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. safety composite

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. held a steady TCR band

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 5.6 in 2020 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.6 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=15.5 · 2023=21.2 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Wixom, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 418% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #126/131
  • PHOTO PSK Steel Corporation
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSK Steel Corporation (1.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. averages 13.8 TCR (418% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. TCR series: 2020=5.6 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=15.5 · 2023=21.2 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 131 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Michigan.

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. (38 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc.
Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. (38 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Hallmark Tool & Gage Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2023 21.2 2.6 8 0 0
2022 15.5 7.8 6 0 0
2021 21.4 8.0 5 3 0
2020 5.6 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Wixom

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 116 employers in Wixom, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSK Steel Corporation 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Light Metals Corporation 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR G&V Machine Company Inc 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starn Tool & Manufacturing Company 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westview Orchards 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE McConnell & Scully, Inc. 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carl Zeiss Industrial Quality Solutions 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Material Handling 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Construction Southeast 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wixom Trijicon 328 FTE
NAT-TCR Landscape East and West Inc 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR K. Kelly, Inc. 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa de Amparo 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR St Joseph Rehab and Nursing Center 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mortenson Masonry, Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1004-71 GoJet EWR MX 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solar Energy Services, Inc. Maryland Headquarters 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE OH-Columbus 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.