Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Hamilton House Senior Living

Cederburg, WI · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hamilton House Senior Living runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Hamilton House Senior Living: 9.8 TCR = 259% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hamilton House Senior Living safety composite

Hamilton House Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hamilton House Senior Living: 6.8 → 11.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2021

Hamilton House Senior Living's TCR rose 4.6 from 6.8 in 2019 to 11.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cederburg, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 259% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #133/171
  • PHOTO Rose Arbor and Wildf…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rose Arbor and Wildflower Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Hamilton House Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hamilton House Senior Living averages 9.8 TCR (259% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hamilton House Senior Living TCR series: 2019=6.8 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=11.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Hamilton House Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Hamilton House Senior Living (34 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hamilton House Senior Living
Hamilton House Senior Living (34 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Hamilton House Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.4 11.4 2 0 0
2020 11.4 5.7 2 0 0
2019 6.8 6.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · Cederburg

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rose Arbor and Wildflower Lodge 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Lease Management LLC dba Primrose of Bismarck 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Bay Pines 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Drumlin Dairy, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrillan East Coating 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant-5D 34 FTE
NAT-TCR PNV 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cowboy Charcoal - Monticello 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbor - Addison School District 4 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Alloy Corporation - Anaheim 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE SYR 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE PXP 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abilene Regional Medical Ctr 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watertown Hotel 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.