General warehousing and storage · Texas

Handgards Pine Springs

El Paso, TX · ~209 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Handgards Pine Springs runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Handgards Pine Springs: 4.8 TCR = 83% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Handgards Pine Springs safety composite

Handgards Pine Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2023

Handgards Pine Springs injury rate improved

Handgards Pine Springs's TCR fell 8.2 from 11.2 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.2 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · El Paso, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #630/846
  • PHOTO North Haven Warehouse
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~209 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Haven Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Handgards Pine Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Handgards Pine Springs averages 4.8 TCR (83% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Handgards Pine Springs TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=9.2 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=2 · 2021=4 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Handgards Pine Springs falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #630 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Handgards Pine Springs (209 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Handgards Pine Springs
Handgards Pine Springs (209 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Handgards Pine Springs has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2022 5.3 3.6 3 0 0
2021 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 9.2 9.2 6 0 0
2016 11.2 7.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · El Paso

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Haven Warehouse 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30248 - CAPSTONE Shamrock Eastvale CA 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SCA3 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR STP Retail, LLC 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast an Oldcastle Company 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Urban Infraconstruction, LLC 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. F. McDonald Electric, Inc. 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE M-Tech Austin 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Carson Plains Casino, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - Lgb 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora BayCare Medical Center 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CR Employment, Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riverside - 2700 Marshall Ne-TQ 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100600 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Bend - Downtown Campus (Admin Offices) 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beacon Specialized Living Minnesota 209 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.