Cancer hospitals · Texas

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities

Bedford, TX · ~209 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cancer hospitals workplace, earning a grade F.

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Cancer hospitals BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities safety composite

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities: 7.4 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2017

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities's TCR rose 2.1 from 7.4 in 2016 to 9.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Bedford, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #182/221
  • PHOTO Cardinal Hill Rehabi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~209 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Cancer hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=9.4 · BLS 3.8

Where HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities falls in its industry

1,390 Cancer hospitals establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #182 safest of 221 Cancer hospitals employers in Texas.

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities (209 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities
HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities (209 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities has more employees than the Cancer hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 9.4 7.1 11 1 0
2016 7.4 4.9 6 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Bedford

1,390 Cancer hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 46 employers in Bedford, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select Physical Therapy Texas (15190 BSW Dallas OP Day Neuro) 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Warren 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHI St. Joseph Health Rehabilitation Hospital an affiliate of Encompass Health 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast an Oldcastle Company 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Urban Infraconstruction, LLC 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. F. McDonald Electric, Inc. 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE M-Tech Austin 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health HEB 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR 020 Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carter BloodCare 870 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1178 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Sioux Falls (Sdsio) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun-Tek Pet LLC 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cone Distributing - Tallahassee 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Chapel Hill - Parks and Recreation 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hydro - Elkhart 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Solutions : IS - FS - Northern USA 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bradley Airsort 85-171 (Ctbra) 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0480 - Windows-Yakima 209 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.